 |
NSW Arbovirus Surveillance & Vector Monitoring Program |  |
 |
Tweed Heads
2000-2001 Mosquito/Virus Results |
 |
Nearby Locations |
||
| Ballina | Port Stephens | Wyong |
Note that for mosquito numbers 0 - 50
mosquitoes = "Low", 51 - 100 = "Medium",
101 - 1,000 = "High", 1,001 - 10,000 = "Very High", >10,000 =
"Extreme".
22/4/2001: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
15/4/2001: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
8/4/2001: Piggabeen had a 'low' collection, while Beltana Drive yielded a 'medium' collection of 56 mosquitoes, with 20 Culex sitiens.
1/4/2001: Piggabeen Rd had a 'medium' collection of 87 mosquitoes, with 68 Culex sitiens. Beltana Drive trapped 'low' numbers.
25/3/2001: Both Piggabeen Rd and Beltana Drive had 'medium' numbers with 69 and 73 mosquitoes respectively. Culex sitiens was the dominant species from both sites.
18/3/2001: Piggabeen Rd had a 'medium' collection of 75 mosquitoes, with 47 Aedes funereus. Beltana Drive trapped 'low' numbers.
11/3/2001: Piggabeen Rd trapped 'low' numbers. Numbers were 'high' (110) from Beltana Drive, with 81 Culex sitiens.
4/3/2001: Piggabeen Rd trapped 'low' numbers. Beltana Drive had a 'medium' collection (70), with 32 Culex sitiens.
25/2/2001: Piggabeen Rd had a 'medium' collection of 60 mosquitoes, with 49 Culex sitiens. Beltana Drive also had 'medium' numbers (63), with 47 Culex sitiens.
18/2/2001: Piggabeen Rd trapped 'low' numbers, while Beltana drive had 'medium' numbers (50), with 32 Culex sitiens.
11/2/2001: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
4/2/2001: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
28/1/2001: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
21/1/2001: Numbers were 'low' from Piggabeen R, while a 'medium' collection of 63 mosquitoes was made from Beltana Drive, with 53 Culex sitiens.
14/1/2001: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
7/1/2001: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
31/12/2000: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
17/12/2000: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
10/12/2000: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
3/12/2000: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
26/11/2000: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
12/11/2000: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
29/10/2000: Numbers were 'low' from both sites.
